[Lou L]

I assume those conservatives who refuse to vote for Romney because he's not the "perfect" fiscally conservative candidate, have not voted for a Republican President since...when? Since Reagan? Since Nixon? Since Eisenhower? I don't think any of those Presidents were perfect candidates going in...perhaps Reagan, in 1984, demonstrated that he took a conservative approach to his office.

Obama has given every outward indication of inflicting harm on our country...his mindset, his policies, and his actions ARE a clear and present danger. A non-vote for Romney by write-in, or third party IS a vote for Obama. He does not care how he wins, only THAT he wins.

While Romney may not be the perfect Republican candidate, it would stop the current hemorrhaging. It would buy us time to push for more conservatives in 2014 and 2016, and to unravel the mess we're in currently.

[delapaz]

My voting history is Bush, Bush, Dole, Bush, Bush, McCain.

McCain was a hard sell, but Palin turned it.

Not this year. I won’t vote for a Liberal Mormon statist.

[GlockThe Vote]

These clinical pyschotics are no different than the iranian nutjobs thinking the imam from the sky is going to come down in 2016 and present the perfect conservative candidate.

[Boogieman]

“conservatives who refuse to vote for Romney because he’s not the “perfect” fiscally conservative candidate”

Who are these people? I haven’t heard of anyone who won’t vote for Romney for that reason. Most won’t vote for him because he’s a socialist, or perhaps because he’s a cult member who secretly supports abortion and gay marriage.