Posted on 10/01/2012 1:54:05 PM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
When the music’s over...turn out the lights.
Awww..shucks...he’s really riled up, there’s an update now and more to come, I wanna say, Loren C, GOOD LUCK WITH THAT!
“... In any case, those nude photo claims will be annihilated for good in the final installment of this series. If you haven’t been convinced yet of Gilbert’s rampant dishonesty and disingenuousness, you will be.”
(Now you know how it feels, the lie went halway ‘round the world before truth had time to get its pants on.)
Anyone who's seen the rest of the Marci Moore pictures knows instantly that they are not the same woman, and I cannot fathom why you are attempting to create the impression that they are.
Why are you doing that?
Good to know I got to ya twerp. Ha ha ha ha ha...
Thanks for the Ping.
bbl
I’m doing that because I’m an idiot and I need a new hobby. Thanks for reminding me.
That they do.
"But, but, but then that would mean that the MX-as-the-real-father narrative would be untrue! That simply cannot be after all I've invested in time and emotion in running down that angle!"
I guess I came too late to this party to have become entrenched in one particular camp as far as what the deception truly is. To my mind, the scenario that Gilbert has laid out seems the most logical/plausible at current, even if it is not complete either. I've at least watched the film, which is more than can be said for many naysayers, from what I've read on this forum.
The fact that zotted LorenC is up in arms over it makes it all the more likely to be hitting very close to home, IMNSHO.
We all do. I personally think your heart is in the right place, but I also think you are sometimes overzealous, and too willing to seize on inconclusive or dubious data, and too quick to reject provable information. (Such as that picture of the young girl with the crooked tooth not being Stanley Ann Dunham.) You have a rare talent for finding information though, i'll grant you that.
Same thing applies to you...
(Such as that picture of the young girl with the crooked tooth not being Stanley Ann Dunham.)
I gave you the link to where that image came from, that website is the same as identified Madelyn and Stanley Armour Dunham as one couple at a dinner table, and if you believe that identification, there's no hope for you...Nicoloff finished off that series by showing, in glorious colour, that zero had reptile skin. That's not where I would choose to collect information - it's written for entertainment value, it's Disney-like.
You have a rare talent for finding information though, i'll grant you that.
I don't have anything other than a reasonably good memory, and I have been following this much longer than you, I joined in 2003, you in 2011 iirc. You're trying to teach an old dog new tricks, and it won't work while you are calling me a liar and being patronizing.
Serves them right for all their lies, those images are now all over the web with her name on them. He can kick and scream and it won’t make any difference now. So what if he can show that the images originated in a certain magazine two years before the Dunhams arrived in Hawaii? No one will believe him anyway.
I’m likin’ it and LOL!
All that effort and all you’ve achieved is to slander a dead woman..... jeez, dude, get a life.
You’ve got a major attention span problem I guess, I’m the last one to have slandered anyone, I’ve spent all my time and worn out my welcome in the process on FR by trying to show that the model wasn’t Stanley Ann Dunham. My last comment was sarcasm. Loren C is going to get nowhere with his denials that S.A.D. posed naked - JUST LIKE I GOT NOWHERE. There’s a certain sector that includes Jerome Corsi and Kincaid who prefer the FMD-AS-FATHER theory and to make that work, Stanley Ann just has to be the girl who took her clothes off, never mind that the first images from one of the magazines Joel Gilbert names was dated 1958, according to Loren C (banned freeper) in his latest update, to which I posted a link.
You might gain some insights if you read through this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2920965/posts
I think we made it clear in that, Gilbert’s story is fake, but it’s been chosen as useful and has gained so much traction, any quest for truth might as well be forgotten. What we see now looks like fighting lies with lies, and for that, I’m not responsible - but I am laughing.
It’s quite obvious to me now that anyone who thinks for themselves and doesn’t march lockstep with one side or the other, is going to get attacked from both sides. I’m an Aussie and I’m wondering how you all got so programmed.
And don’t tell me to get a life, I’ve got one, thank you.
This is almost like some psychological “separate the sheep from the goats” test performed by the universe.
Strait is the gate...
The sign on the gate might say something like this:
“Only the thirst for Truth counts, everything else is worthless”.
It can lead one to unusual places. And condemnation from others; too bad.
Read the article...
It’s from the Gilbert’s Paul Is dead “documentary.
Really? then show us.
The Model Joel Gilbert maintains is Stanley Ann Dunham POSED FOR EXOTIC MAGAZINES IN THE LATE FIFTIES WHILE STANLEY ANN WAS STILL IN HIGH SCHOOL IN SEATTLE.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.