The evidence he has uncovered is false because he’s... he’s.... he’s a nut!?
I believe the evidence stands on it’s own merits. Frank Davis took naked pictures of Stanley Ann Dunham in December of 1960, shortly after she became pregnant.
Didn’t see a rebuttal to those facts anywhere in your excerpt. What’s a matter? Can’t do anything other than ad hominem the messenger? So he’s a nut, but the facts he has uncovered speak for themselves. Let’s talk about the actual evidence, shall we?
Forthcoming...it's a series.
This is her in 1960:
1959.
1958
This is not her:
At least not her in 1960.
This is her in 1972:
Unless she had her jaw broken and reset twice, it ain't her.
Lets talk about the actual evidence, shall we?
They don’t like to do that...ever. Wonder why?