To: old and tired
Normally I'd agree because there is nowhere to go but up, even if he loses because the press would say he performed better than in the first debate however, foreign policy is coming up; there's NOTHING he can say on that subject that can help him. The only issues the sycophantic press have been able to manipulate are the economy, health care and immigration. Two of the three were covered last night and on these subjects, Mitt removed decades of dirt from the venue floor with Obama last night.
Obama is toast; his only options are to continue to take the beatings from Mitt and in turn, watch his residency come to its rightful end or to come up with an creative means to avoid further debate.
28 posted on
10/04/2012 8:58:07 AM PDT by
liberalh8ter
(If Barack has a memory like a steel trap, why can't he remember what the Constitution says?)
To: liberalh8ter
Normally I'd agree because there is nowhere to go but up, even if he loses because the press would say he performed better than in the first debate however, foreign policy is coming up; there's NOTHING he can say on that subject that can help him. That's a good point. Mitt handled the Middle East fiasco so much better than I was expecting. I have to admit I'm very much enjoying watching the liberals and their lap dogs in the media defend Obama today.
I've never understood why everyone just accepted that Mr. Uh Uh Uh was some great orator. I never saw it - even when speaking flawlessly from the TOTUS, he always struck me as an arrogant, condescending SOB. And without it, he was all um um um. Obviously, I wasn't the only one thinking that - my guess is that Jon Stewart heard it plenty and that's why he's so quick to jump on the possibility that all those um's back in 2008 were stupidity and not deep thought.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson