Posted on 11/15/2012 6:30:48 AM PST by Evil Slayer
And you think the Senate would vote to remove him from office after the House impeached him? Remember Clinton?
Sorry, won’t happen. Even if true, even if exposed, even if impeached by House.......
We are deeply into days of lawlessness - by government....
The final report:
The Petraeus CIA provided inaccurate information about events on the ground to the Obama Administration, particularly to President Obama and United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice.
The press suppressed information until after the election.
The Senate WILL NOT move on any issue impeachment.
The media will make this a one day story at best.
It must be true, it’s on the internet.
The story about the request to release the blind sheik was out there before Benghazi. There were several articles by Andrew McCarthy and the guy who led the prosecution team in the case against the blind Sheik, saying that Americans needed to beware because they thought that Obama was maneuvering to release him and that if he didn’t do it before the election that win or lose he would do it after the election.
There is some value in impeachment without conviction. At minimum, we at least go down fighting. Perhaps it wounds and hobbles the regime; perhaps it makes them more defiant; either way, impeachment is either right or wrong on its own merit, regardless of what reed (sick!) does or does not do.
obama says: “Eat your golden goose and stfu!”
(nothing will come of this)
Even if this could be proved beyond any possible shadow of a doubt, the media, the Senate and the 47% wouldn’t care a bit. The only response would be “we won”,
Oh, he can be impeached. Clinton was impeached, but the Senate failed to remove him from office.
Brings to mind former LA Gov. Edwin Edwards' statement, "the only thing that could do me in is if I were caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
Were this to happen to Obama, the "media" would hide the dead girl and blame the boy.
It is my cynical belief that Obama could freely hand over all our military assets to Russia, China and Iran and the voting sheeple
would hardly blink
Santa Claus has been re-elected and we can go back to watching DWTS. Benghazi LIbya.. Is that a new wings place?
Barak Obama can do as he pleases and he knows it. Who is there to stop him?
“Genl Betrayus will take whatever blame should be Obamas”
He certainly will since his wife got paid off.
Might be a plot to a movie...but the motive doesn’t sound plausible. To trade away the blind sheik would smell more like capitulation to terrorists than Obama riding to the rescue. Seems to me *that* would have had a negative impact on his popularity.
Constitution 101.
#
Col. Ken ALLARD: Obama knew about the attack, ignored three requests for help
Sunday, October 28, 2012 7:42:26 AM · 4 of 38
wiggen to Cincinatus’ Wife
The ambassador was not meant to die i bet. Smoke inhalation. I bet all along he was going to be captured without a shot being fired hence the stand down orders. Obama frees him and boom,big positive public relations before the election. If,as is widely assumed we arm arming the rebels in Syria would these people attack us at this time?The whole narrative changed when the 2 CIA men went and engaged the enemy with full expectation of help. This story is likely far dirtier than it;s even being reported.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies
Trading the blind sheik for a kidnapped US ambassador doesn’t seem like it would have been a big political win for Obama. All the same questions concerning lax security that allowed the successful terrorist attack could also have been asked about how a US ambassador could have been kidnapped.
Some of the actions and inactions by the administration that are supposed to have followed the supposed boshed kidnapping plan do make sense, but trading the blind sheik for a kidnapped ambassador sure wouild not have been a foreign policy victory for Obama. The opposite.
Who’s going to impeach him? Boehner’s House? Who’s going to convict him? Reid’s Senate? Who’s going to put pressure on Congress to do something? The MSM or the Obamaphone nation?
Don’t see it happening.
I have been so angry and frustrated over Benghazi since it happened I don't know what to do.
Romney should have been all over this and the O's other impeachable offenses, of which there are plenty.
McStupid is NOW all over this, but where was he when most of us conservatives knew what Obama was going to be? Well, he was listening to Steve Schmidt and his other overpriced know nothings and teling us O would make a good President, basically endorsing the enemy.
The diff between McCain and Romney's vote was Sarah Palin.
vaudine
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.