Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah

There are rightwing libertarians who find the paramilitarization of police forces, no-knock raids, and civil asset forfeiture without even the benefit of a charge let alone a trial, more of a threat than the drugs against which the war on drugs is reputedly being fought.

Assuming they’re all potheads and druggies is a mistake, therefore.


19 posted on 11/16/2012 3:47:11 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: RegulatorCountry

I’ve changed my stance on Drugs substantially over the past decade.

I have no use for dopers or meth heads.

However, if we believe the basic theories of economics, and if we look at what we should have learned from prohibition, it becomes obvious that the current drug laws:
1) Make the wrong people rich
2) Are responsible for 50,000 dead south of the border.

Cary Nation set the stage for Al Capone.
Tough drug laws have very negative consequences.


25 posted on 11/16/2012 3:56:31 AM PST by AlbertWang
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: RegulatorCountry
Well, let's see ~ victimless crimes ~ one of my cousins was murdered by her druggy husband with a shotgun. We blame the druggy and his drugs, not the inanimate object ~ and some idiot in the Army decided he had to beat me up with a broom stick in the barracks one evening ~ he was high ~ I thrashed him in the end.

Another druggy robbed my apartment ~ he was eventually caught and was discovered to have murdered two people.

Frankly, in my experience, there's always something with these guys that ends up proving they do not become devotees of the doctrines of ahemsa.

31 posted on 11/16/2012 4:09:16 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson