[JCBreckenridge]

I read through the entirety of what you posted. What it defends is ‘state imposts and excises’.

What it does not defend is your thesis that the federal government cannot regulate imposts and excises.

Still waiting for some language from the constitution which says this, btw. I’ve been quoting the consitution all the time, and amazingly enough, you still haven’t cottoned on. :)

[tacticalogic]

You've made the mistake of assuming I'm a "libertarian". If we're going to start pigeonholeing, then I'm not going fit into that box very well.

I'm not as much libertarian as I am republican, and not willing to let the republic be collateral damage in your war with the libertarians. You cannot and apparently have no intention of even trying to comprehend the unintended consequences of the means you want to use to wage it.