Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: 4Zoltan

BC#’s for at least 4 children born in Aug 1961 have been altered. The BC#’s they currently have on their BC’s at the HDOH could not have been on those BC’s in 1961 - according to either of the 2 contradictory numbering methods described by past and current HDOH spokesmen.

That means that the HDOH is altering BC#’s. The only place the statutes allow for somebody to get a BC# that’s different than the one they are originally given is if law enforcement says that a totally fake new BC needs to be created to protect the registrant from danger. In that case, the totally false BC will say whatever law enforcement says it needs to say.

None of it true.

That is how Obama got all that stuff on a BC at the HDOH. If he was really born at Kapiolani, there would be no need for the record to be either late or altered.


58 posted on 01/16/2013 3:16:14 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion; palmer; Nero Germanicus

And when were these numbers switched - 1961 or later?

Hawaii Revised Statutes §338-17.7 Establishment of new certificates of birth, when.

(5) Upon request of a law enforcement agency certifying that a new birth certificate showing different information would provide for the safety of the birth registrant; provided that the new birth certificate shall contain information requested by the law enforcement agency, shall be assigned a new number and filed accordingly, and shall not substitute for the birth registrant’s original birth certificate, which shall remain in place.

Assigned a “new number” not someone else’s number and filed by that new number.


59 posted on 01/16/2013 5:18:21 PM PST by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson