Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Kadric
Actually according to US vs Miller in order for a firearm to be protected by the 2nd it must have a militarily useful purpose.

Excellent point! Makes you wonder why the ATF "regulates" short barreled shotguns, no? Remington makes model 870 shotguns w/ an 11" barrel and sells them as NFA items.

Regards,
GtG

27 posted on 01/18/2013 9:31:32 PM PST by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Gandalf_The_Gray

“Excellent point! Makes you wonder why the ATF “regulates” short barreled shotguns, no?”

The Miller case was about a short barreled shotgun. The government argued that the short barreled shotgun wasn’t used in the military. None of the justices questioned that statement and were not aware that in fact, short barreled shotguns were in use in the military.

The Defendant in the case, Miller, could never be located so there was no one arguing his side of the matter. The SJC only heard the government’s side of things and that was it.

And the rest, as they say, is history.


34 posted on 01/18/2013 10:50:12 PM PST by Stormdog (A rifle transforms one from subject to Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson