The random guy from Jamaica had an arrest warrant issued in Hawaii on the May 5, 1982, bearing number “BWO 050582.”
A prosecutor on April 9, 2003, (21 years later and just before Obama stood for Illinois Senate) filed an ex parte motion to recall the bench warrant and announced on the record “nolle prosequi.” This is a Latin phrase which is formally entered into a court record which means that the prosecutor in a criminal case “will no further prosecute” the case.
Why did the prosecutor quash a warrant on a nobody from Jamaica?
If Obama’s legal name and person was Bari Malik Shabazz he “Obama” was in criminal legal jeopardy. That’s why the warrant was quashed and Bari Shabazz’s legal existance terminated.
Obama had two or more parallel ID’s running.
“Why did the prosecutor quash a warrant on a nobody from Jamaica?”
Maybe he was dead? Maybe he cut a deal with the prosecutors? Maybe they do that automatically after a certain time with minor warrants, rather than clogging up the system?
Any of those would make more sense than that they “quashed” the warrant to protect Obama, when the warrant wasn’t in Obama’s name, so he had no danger of being arrested under it.
“If Obama’s legal name and person was Bari Malik Shabazz he “Obama” was in criminal legal jeopardy.”
Well, he wasn’t, so there was no jeopardy.