>> Let’s fight the battles we can win.
>
> The House of Representatives has the “sole” power of impeachment. Between elections, impeachment (and the 25th Amendment) is the only legal path to the removal of a White House occupant. The Supreme Court has no power to remove presidents.
Question: How can the Supreme court remove a President if the Constitution itself prevents the person in question from BEING the President?
The Constitution of the United States does not empower the Supreme Court to decide who can be the president.
From an intellectual standpoint, it is not hard to get yourself so tangled up in being questions that you become paralyzed. However, if you insist on turning this whole thing into a philosophical question:
Right now, Barack Obama either is or is not the president of the United States.
If Barack Obama is the president, the Constitution grants to the House of Representatives the "sole" power of impeachment and to the Senate the power to remove following impeachment. The Constitution does not provide the Supreme Court with that power.
If Barack Obama is not the president, then there isn't any need for anyone to do anything. You can just ignore what everyone tells you about the so-called "President Obama." You're not required to believe any of it.