[Jeff Winston]

You really are concerned with the accuracy of evidence as you espouse yourself to be, you should do something about the erroneous graph on your homepage since the decision of Wong Kim Ark never said he was a natural-born citizen.

No, but the entire rationale of the case, for dozens and dozens of pages, had to do with who was and was not "natural born."

Perhaps you can also explain why the dissent said the majority's decision made people like Wong Kim Ark eligible to be President?

Since you've found my page, you've also found the FACT that I have clear and pretty much conclusive evidence that it was NOT Vattel who contributed "Offences against the Law of Nations" to our Constitution. But you don't mention that. I wonder why?

Oh, wait. We know why, don't we? It's because you already decided that you clearly prefer your birther fantasy to reality, that no evidence and no reality would ever change your mind.

[MamaTexan]

Perhaps you can also explain why the dissent said the majority's decision made people like Wong Kim Ark eligible to be President?

Nice maneuver in an attempt to draw me into conjecture while evading the original question.

Please show me exactly where in the decision the judges said Wong Kim was a 'natural-born citizen'.

[MamaTexan]

No, but the entire rationale of the case, for dozens and dozens of pages, had to do with who was and was not "natural born."

Immaterial. You, yourself admit the claim that Wong Kim was determined to be a natural-born citizen is false, yet it is still being presented by you as a truth via the specious reasoning of the 'rationale' instead of the FACTS of the case.

You, sir, are a fraud.