You can’t refute the analysis, which can be read and understood by anybody.
All you can do is obfuscate.
As for “connecting the dots,” the dots on which your silly theory are based don’t even exist.
Here is the bottom line. Herb Titus, the Constitutional Scholar with impeccable credentials to make him a expert on the natural born Citizen issue would agree with this. Being born a citizen does not necessarily make for a natural born citizen. If you are born in the US to foreign citizen parent or parents, you are a naturalized citizen at birth – naturalized by the 14th amendment. If you are born abroad to US citizen parents, you are a naturalized citizen at birth – naturalized by a federal statute. But, if you are born in the U.S. to U.S. citizen parents, no human law (which is what naturalization is) is needed to establish your citizenship at birth – you are a citizen at birth by the laws of nature – hence you are a “natural” born citizen and eligible for Article 2 Section 1 to be president. You see, a statutory citizen (bestowed by man’s pen) can never be a “natural born” citizen (bestowed by God/nature).