The “female author” (me) understands that the spiritual corruption of the United States is not a result of “women voting.” It’s a result of the people choosing darkness over light. This includes both men and women, of course.
The paragraph from my column that you quoted says it just as it is. Obama is the “leader” we have “earned” by our nation spitting in the Lord’s face for so many years.
Bad behavior is a result of spiritual corruption—not the other way around.
Whoa. Don’t think I’ve seen this before on FR, where the author of an article posted to FR by a “third party” responds, along with that third party, to a comment about the article made by another poster on FR. That would be like my criticizing Krugman’s piece in the New York Times, after it had been posted to FR, and suddenly here comes Krugman, attacking my criticism of his article, along with the original poster, who just so happens to own a blog apparently totally dedicated to Krugman’s writings. Something nefarious about this but I can’t quite put my finger on it. Anyone care to take a look? Maybe an Admin?