[Marcella]

“...in that it correctly stated the two circumstances in which an individual born in 1968 is a natural-born United States citizen: (1) that the person was born in the United States or (2) born outside the United States to a biologically-related United States citizen parent who met certain residency requirements.””

That is exactly right. If you are an American citizen, that citizenship is in your body - you don't renounce it if you go to another country and if you have a child there, it “inherits” your citizenship and you fill out a form stating such. You are the American (with American reproductive parts) if you are in America or in Pogostan or Magicland or the land of the Wizard of Oz.

[Seizethecarp]

“If you are an American citizen, that citizenship is in your body - you don’t renounce it if you go to another country and if you have a child there, it “inherits” your citizenship and you fill out a form stating such.”

Note that the 9th Circus requires compliance with “residency requirements” for a foreign birth. Only a trial on the merits with full discovery of the birth location, marriage legitimacy of the parents could determine whether the 9th Circus standard #2 is met. The SCOTUS would have to uphold it to extend this definition beyond the 9th Circus (the most overturned Circuit, BTW...thus 9th Circus, IMO).