Posted on 05/27/2013 11:06:28 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Since 1998, they have introduced a range or piston driven light aircraft that have proven popular with kit enthusiasts -- the two-place Sonex, Y-tail Waiex and the Onex single-seater.
Now they've unveiled the jet-powered SubSonex.
The "pre-prototype" SubSonex JSX-1 has been flying since August, 2011. It looks like its piston relatives, except that instead of a propeller, a surprisingly compact PBS TJ-100 turbojet engine is mounted on the top rear of the fuselage, directly in front of the distinctive Waiex Y tail.
The TJ-100 puts out only 247 pounds of thrust, but that's enough to propel this tiny 400 lb aircraft through the air with decent performance. Upon takeoff, the JSX-1 is capable of climbing 2,000 ft/min at 140 mph. Its cruise speed is 170 mph, while its Vne is 197 mph - the same as its piston-powered siblings.
(VIDEO-AT-LINK)
Test pilot Jim Carlton eloquently outlines how flying a very small jet differs from a prop aircraft in an article for AOPA Pilot Magazine: "In essence, flying a small jet is like driving a car that only has fifth gear. Don’t expect jackrabbit starts. However, unlike a propeller—which loses thrust with increasing airspeed—the jet just continues to push. Its thrust even increases slightly with speed. The takeoff roll begins at a stately pace, but increases steadily to a rotation speed of 80 mph, at which time you become fully aware of the diminutive four-inch main wheels and lack of spring suspension. A slight pull on the side stick and you’re airborne.
With no pounding pistons, pulsing prop, or propeller slipstream, the instant transformation from an overspeeding wagon to intense smooth is nothing short of inspirational. The acceleration continues, quickly pushing the little craft to its best climb speed of 140 mph. A little nose up and she’s rocketing skyward at nearly 2,000 feet per minute. Raising the nose gear further enhances the silky smooth ride. Once airborne, there are no surprises. With the SubSonex’s light weight, ample control surfaces, and short wings, handling is understandably sporty, but not twitchy. With the pilot’s full-forward position and no engine or propeller up front, visibility through the bubble canopy is superb. With a good noise-cancelling headset, the experience is a bit glider-like, except for the speed and climb rate."
The prototype flight test program was promising, but there were a number of things the designers wanted to change. The most glaring issue was the cockpit, which measured 24" at the pilot's shoulders but tapered to a mere 20" at the control panel. A second prototype is already under construction with a cockpit that measures 24" wide throughout. The new shape will improve the appearance of the nose, which will be extended and taper more gently. They plan on replacing the manually retractable nosewheel with electrically retractable nose and wing gear. A ballistic parachute will be installed immediately behind the cockpit, eliminating the need for the pilot to wear one during flight.
Of course, jets burn more fuel than piston aircraft, especially at low altitude. The Subsonex is no different - it consumes 18 gph at 10,000 ft. With a 40 gallon tank, that should give you enough fuel for a 350 mile trip with a VFR reserve.
While the Sonex team is obviously excited about this little aircraft, they have no plans to put the aircraft into production quite yet. Their immediate goal is to complete the new JSX-2 prototype and put it through its paces in the air. If they're happy, SubSonex kits could eventually hit the market for as little as $60,000.
And then there are right-wing talkers.
 Rush, on right, gives Mark Levin a lift on N1EB |
If I made more than $100 million a year, I’d probably own a plane, too.
An example.
Much safer than a car.
Don’t want to hijack this thread, I knew Rush had a jet at his disposal, but I thought he was part of a jet “time share”. But I see the plane has the “EIB” logo, so it must his own personal thing. I sincerely hope he has security guarding his hanger all night. Many enemies would love to sabotage that plane. And I am completely serious about that.
“Much safer than a car.”
It is.....until you have an accident.
The death rate per mile traveled for planes vs
cars is minimal. The death rate per accident
for planes vs cars is astronomical.
As motorcycle riders say “it’s not ‘if’ you’re
going to have an accident, it’s when”. The same
thing applies to private planes.....go up in one
often enough and eventually you will come down the
wrong way.
I have the unhealthy habit of googling tail numbers of airliners I'm about to board. Most of them turn out to be owned not by the airline but by some obscure corporate identity, such as CFS Air.
It's a financing matter. Do you want to tie up $x million owning an airplane vs $x/n million leasing it?
There are careful pilots that have flown all their lives. There are pilots that make bad decisions that well, also fly all their lives, but shorter lives.
It’s all a matter of quality. Quality preflight, maintenance, preplanning, situational attention, and decision making, and the ability to abort, even when you’re close to home. If you can do quality, accidents are exceedingly rare.
Most accident reports I read are some type of pilot issue. VFR pilots wandering into instrument meteorological conditions, get-there-itis, or bad situational awareness. It’s very rarely a cylinder blowing out causing fatal crashes.
There are old pilots and there are bold pilots; there are no old, bold pilots. Replace “bold” with any adjective you choose, such as “ stupid” etc.
TC
A navigator’s definition of latitude and Longitude: Latitude is where we are lost and Longitude is how long we’ve been lost there.” USAF Navi=guesser
Pretty cool, for about the cost of a luxury SUV!
I’ve never flown a kit...
Took a stroll thru the Piper factory once, that was enough for me to see!!
I’ll stick with production a/c personally, but there are some cool kits out there.
Cessna 206?
How many people die everyday on the road?
Piper Saratoga
Nice
All good points, and I’ll add running out of fuel, as one of the reasons most often cited for a crash.
You can’t fix stupid.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.