“IMO, the “blue dress” in this case is a 1961 Honolulu newspaper that does not contain the birth announcement that has been seen in jpgs OR it’s a piece of physical evidence that places SAD out of Hawaii on Aug. 8, 1961.”
I am not convinced that the HI birth notices were forged. They are entirely consistent with a possible simple registration of a foreign birth to an HI resident or of the grandchild of a resident.
I regard Zullo’s claim to have obtained a certification of forgery authenticated from a federally qualified expert witness forensic digital document laboratory to be a BLUE DRESS moment.
It is the equivalent of fingerprint or DNA evidence in federal court.
Proof that Barry’s BC is forged can be directly attributable to Barry and his minions because they personally claimed it was authentic while the newspaper notices, if forged, were never admissible as direct evidence of HI birth and cannot be personally linked to Barry.
“I am not convinced that the HI birth notices were forged. They are entirely consistent with a possible simple registration of a foreign birth to an HI resident or of the grandchild of a resident.”
How did they settle on which Kapiolani dr. to name on the LF BC?
