Something Zullo told me that I think is relevant: If a law enforcement entity notifies a Congressman of a crime, that Congressman is legally accountable for acting on it.
Gallups referred to a Congress member who had arranged to meet with Zullo and then pretended to not know anything about those arrangements. That is because once they have that report from law enforcement, they are legally obligated to act.
The legal groundwork is being laid so that Congress HAS to act on this issue.
The significance of Congress acting is that they can compel production of records - records which will show not only the wrong-doing by Obama’s people but also the wrong-doing by the very Hawaii officials that most members of Congress cite as having affirmed Obama’s birth story. When the records are made available and depositions compelled, the world will see exactly how corrupt the entire system has been - and it will make the IRS scandal seem like piddles in comparison.
If/when Congress investigates and an independent prosecutor gets access to the records, THAT is when arrests will be made - because then the names of the people involved will be known, together with the proof of their involvement. Without the actual records it’s near-impossible to pin down the specific actions to specific individuals.
At that point it will also be known that Obama has no legally-valid Hawaii BC, and I believe the records will show that his birth was originally reported by his grandma and his BC was not complete until late 2006, when he amended it to add a birth weight. The rules in Hawaii were so lax, about the only reason for a local registrar to not be able to gather all the necessary information is if the child was nowhere to be found in Hawaii within that first month after the birth. Which would be very strange indeed if the child was born in Hawaii, because the airlines would not let so young a child fly out of Hawaii. The amendment that Obama made in late 2006 reveals the Hawaii birth claim as fraudulent, and that is why he had to have a COLB forged.
It’s also why nobody knew whether to claim a Queens or a Kapiolani birth until after Obama had already announced his run for the presidency, even though he referenced his birth at Queens Hospital in his Feb 2007 announcement that he was running: his actual record didn’t claim ANY hospital as the birthplace, and Obama didn’t realize until June of 2007 (when he ordered a copy of his COLB and it came back showing his 2006 amendment adding a birth weight) that they were going to have to come up with a fake so nobody would know about the original birth claim being a home birth reported by Madelyn Dunham.
This is what I suspect, and I’ve got some good reasons to suspect it. But until the records are produced, none of it can be absolutely proven. And that is why they have fought like heck all these years to keep the records hidden.
At my son’s optometrist appointment yesterday I looked at the records disclosure policy. I remembered reading something similar at a dr’s appt I had last year but I can’t find that actual statement. Here’s what the optometrist’s statement says:
“In some limited situations, the law allows or requires us to use or disclose your health information without your permission. Not all of these situations will apply to us; some may never come up at our office at all. Such uses or disclosures are:...Disclosures for law enforcement purposes, such as to provide information about someone who is or is suspected to be a victim of a crime; to provide information about a crime at our office; or to report a crime that happened somewhere else...(snip) Uses or disclosures for specialized government functions, such as for the protection of the president or high-ranking government officials; for lawful national intelligence activities; for military purposes; or for the evaluation and health of members of the Foreign Service”
When Zullo and Mackiewcz (sp?) showed up at Kapiolani Hospital, identified themselves as law enforcement, and asked to see the labor room log, that was a law enforcement purpose regarding a criminal investigation, and that disclosure is thus allowable by HIPAA, if I’m understanding correctly. The military people that Lakin asked to check out Obama’s eligibility would presumably also have been allowed by HIPAA to see that log, for the military purpose of determining the lawfulness of orders.
So all the excuses they’ve hidden behind are a bunch of crap. But if an independent federal investigator/prosecutor issued a subpoena for those records, they would have to be produced. Or a search warrant for the records could be obtained, bypassing the involvement of the people who have hidden records for Obama’s sake.
Right now we have to push for a Congressional investigation. That’s the only way we’re going to get access to the critical records. And anybody who wants to keep those records hidden... exposes their own understanding that the records would incriminate Obama. There is no other reason to want those records hidden.
“It’s also why nobody knew whether to claim a Queens or a Kapiolani birth until after Obama had already announced his run for the presidency, even though he referenced his birth at Queens Hospital in his Feb 2007 announcement that he was running:”
Was this the announcement he made in the cold? And do you have a link?