Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Ramius

Exactly.
I’ve always struggled buying the statement that it was genetic. It seems to be in direct contradiction with Darwinian law. Not being able to pass your genetic material over time is a genetic death sentence; no matter how strong, intelligent, or fast you are. Even if it was genetic, one would think that the carriers of it would have died out over time, because it is so useless to the evolution of the species. Just like tails are to us now.
That is of course, if the theory of evolution is true. I’m just pointing out the contradiction in logic.


63 posted on 06/01/2013 7:54:45 PM PDT by NullPointerException
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: NullPointerException
It seems to be in direct contradiction with Darwinian law.

I agree, but I did get a chuckle out of that. Imagine pointing that out to the liberal Animist. Homosexuality is not genetically possible without violating the primary law of liberalism.

This would be the equivalent of the original Star Trek Nomad meltdown in the The Chaneling.
71 posted on 06/01/2013 8:32:53 PM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the Occupation Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson