I thought I read that ‘Harrison Bounel’ is a name that just suddenly appeared in records, & couldn’t be traced back to original sources? (I admit I haven’t had time lately to keep up with all the details.) Is it now just a matter of reconciling ‘Harry’ to ‘Harrison’? Taitz, in her filing, said she could prove Obama was using ‘Harrison’s’ SS#, correct? So is she saying Harry & Harrison are one & the same?
From a statistical point of view, the probability is very high that "Harry" and Harrison" are indeed one and the same. Their years of birth are the same or very close, plus the fact is that the surname Bounel is extremely rare in the US (only three persons with that name listed in the whole national telephone listings). Also, it should be noted that the geographical location of "Harry Bounel" in 1940 is within at most 50 miles of the location in CT where the "Harrison J. Bounel" SSN was issued in 1977.