Replies

So we ALREADY have evidence of big-time crimes being committed by government officials to cover up for Obama. The evidence already exists; it’s too late for Obama to put the genie back in the bottle.
We just can’t find anybody in the media, law enforcement, courts, or state or federal legislatures who will do anything about it. And THAT is the real story of Obama’s eligibility issue.
When we find out why Judge Surick allowed somebody else to write his decision for him, we will probably be well on our way to understanding why EVERYBODY within government, media, law enforcement, and the courts has bent over backwards - even to the point of creating forgeries and breaking laws - to cover for Obama. When we know what threat they used on all these judges, etc it will tell us who is holding America’s entire infrastructure hostage today.

That's it in a nutshell.

also replying to FredNerks' #305... Another section of butterdezillion's post that I quoted upthread mentions a duplicate entry: ".....If we looked at what has happened to the Hawaii birth record for Mae Obado we would probably find that she had an original record that was entered into the system whenever they converted to electronic database. We would probably find that a duplicate record was created for her sometime maybe in March of 2010. The database immediately marked it as a duplicate so that the entry for that became “Obado, Duplicate Mae” - unbeknownst to whoever created the duplicate. Whoever created the duplicate immediately changed Mae Obado’s name to Barack Hussein Obama II, not realizing that the record he/she had just created was NOT still called “Obado, Mae” in the database but was now “Obado, DUPLICATE Mae” so what was changed to Obama was the ORIGINAL record for Mae Obado, leaving for Mae Obado only the “Obado, DUPLICATE Mae” record. The end result is that a printout would show “Obado, Duplicate Mae”, followed next in line by “Obama, Barack Hussein II” - since the original record for Mae Obado was altered to say Barack Hussein Obama II. The duplicate record for Mae Obado when there isn’t any original record for Mae Obado gives away that the original record was altered after a duplicate was created for her. And that’s exactly what the HDOH had in their (supposed) 1960-64 birth index book as of sometime after March, 2010. (This kind of sloppy work shows up in regards to the alleged birth announcements for Obama as well.) If we looked up the history for the BC# that Obama has on the Factcheck COLB we would probably find that it originated in 1961 under a different name. We would be able to find out who that BC# originally belonged to. We would be able to find out when the name associated with that BC# was altered and by whom. ...." Looks like whoever was messing with/entering the data fatfingered something in that area and the computer dutifully followed its algorithm and said: DUPLICATE Hmmm, I just noticed something: The third name down from OBAMA II, BARACK HUSSEIN is another MAE, this one is OBAR, CORINNA MAE. No DUPLICATE above or below it.

After I posted that, somebody said that the times on the Surick fax were from that fax being forwarded from BERG’s office to whoever posted it online. I don’t know enough about how faxes are forwarded and how the times appear when faxes are sent and received to know which claims are true so on my blog I said I’d put that claim on hold. I still don’t know which claim is true. Maybe somebody here can help me sort that out.

However, finding out that the NSA has been spying on judges, justices, and Congress means that somebody had potential extortion material, and Surick did do a quick, irreversible 180-degree turnaround on this decision - as did Chief Justice Roberts on Obamacare. Someone with access to sources has told me that Bush’s administration was complicit in the media threats by Emanuel and Axelrod. He says they were afraid of race riots. Maybe. A military friend told me at the time that riots would only be in the large cities, if at all, and the National Guard would be well-equipped and trained to stop them if necessary. The threat of riots does fit the same veiled threats made by Schumer regarding amnesty, and it fits the mob attacks we were seeing so much of around the time of Trayvon’s death.

Maybe they were afraid of another run on the bank.

Either way, if they thought it was a national security risk I don’t doubt that they would have spied on judges for extortion material and used it. That’s what the whistleblowers seem to be saying - that this crap started under Bush and Obama has made it worse.