Let’s stay focused, Jeff.
You stated no one has proven the birth certificate to be irrelevant in determining the eligibility for the office of POTUS. I provided an example of a situation where the birth certificate was irrelevant in determining eligibility for POTUS; i.e. Obama naturalized years after his birth and made his place of birth irrelevant.
Here’s another example:
Regardless of where John McCain was born, he is eligible to be POTUS because his parents were U.S. Citizens at the time of his birth. Regardless of where McCain was born or what information is on his birth certificate, his parent’s citizenship status at the time of his birth make him eligible for POTUS. Consequently, the birth certificate is irrelevant.
It’s a false narrative perpetuated by Obama supporters that Obama has proven he eligible by providing the currently available records from the State of Hawaii. Obama needs to waive his privacy rights and disclose his immigration records with DHS to prove he did enter the United States in 1971 as an Indonesian National and naturalize in 1983. His birth certificate is irrelevant and amendable.
Sorry, your claim is BS unless you can prove that Obama actually did give up his US citizenship, or unless you can prove that he actually was naturalized as a citizen.
If you can prove either of the above - not just claim it's true, actually PROVE it - then you have a case. Otherwise, well, I hate to put it this way, but OTHERWISE, you're just another loon.