Replies

There was legitimate argument against the birthers to begin with, legitimate arguments that show the birther nonsense is not the constitutional way, yet you seem to be choosing to go all guilt trip instead of realizing you may not be correct in presuming the birthers are the ones who might be seeing this wrong.

Lake, I'm not trying to guilt trip you, but your argument is one based in desperation - not logic. Your last response is all over the map.

Now you're accusing those of us who understand the NBC clause as the Framers did, of being Stormfronters? Friend, I'd expect a slander like that out of a GOP-e shill or a lib, but not a Freeper.

And you keep throwing the word 'purist' around like it's an ad hominem. Dude. Do you realize what ground you're arguing from? Only the enemies of the republic want to see the NBC standard weakened. Conservatives want to see the highest standard possible maintained.

Alright. I tried to end off a few posts back before we got here. It's not my intent to escalate the disagreement and distance between us by arguing over this.

If you don't think the birther thing is deeply centered in the Stormfronters, you're being naive. They ARE the epicenter of the issue, and they're NOT REALLY THE LAST WORD OR THE REPOSITORY OF TRUTH ON THIS ISSUE!. Sorry I yelled......:-)

You're still not addressing the actual issue, you're just claiming the birthers are the ones who understand the truth, and to me clearly they aren't. It's the same scam the RonPaulers used to run, they would claim they were the ones who loved the constitution, and were the only ones that understood it. They used it as a guilt trip on those who disagreed with them.

Okay, I'm also going to back off, I respect you too much, and no, I don't think you're a Stormfronter, never did.

I wish you a good day sir, and truly mean it.