If the recipient accepts the certified Letter of Verification in Lieu of Certified Copy in his official capacity as Chief Elections Official of the state (which both the Arizona and Kansas Secretaries of State did) then the Hawaii Registrar’s Letters of Verification served their intended purpose regardless of the actual wording.
Neither of the state officials who received certified Letters of Verification from Dr. Onaka challenged their veracity.
Bennett didn’t challenge it because he assumed the letter of verification was wrong, even though the legal presumption is supposed to be for regularity. That cool with you? An official asking a question and dismissing the under-oath response as wrong just because he wants to believe it’s wrong?
And Kobach didn’t challenge it because the objector withdrew the objection after having him and his family members’ lives threatened. That cool with you?