Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

“The founding fathers didn’t believe that every Tom Dick and Harry should vote — there were eligibility requirements. “

I’d say, right off the top, they were about at least 50% more restrictive...

I don’t see what was wrong with testing requirements. Certainly, an understanding of government, local and national should be required. You might say that public schooling should do this, and I would just laugh. And the test should be periodic and available in English only.

These days, I don’t think we are too far away from Africa, where they put a photo of the candidate with the symbol of the party on the ballot. For example, here, we would have put a drawing of an ass next to a photo of every Democrat.


24 posted on 10/20/2013 8:21:44 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: The Antiyuppie
I’d say, right off the top, they were about at least 50% more restrictive...

Free, white, male, 21, and a property owner, iirc.

There may have been others who had skin in the game, but in colonial times, that pulled in most.

60 posted on 10/20/2013 11:50:34 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson