Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: C210N

Hamilton and Jefferson hated each other passionately, but I admit, the more I learned about the both of them, the more I liked Hamilton and the less I liked Jefferson.

Jefferson stabbed Washington in the back by anonymously spreading stories that Washington was a doddering, easily manipulated, and disengaged leader.

Washington found out from an unimpeachable source who was behind it, and confronted Jefferson directly, and let him know in no uncertain terms that he was aware of what Jefferson had been doing (in his attempts to get back at Hamilton) and that socially, they were finished.

It was said that while he and Jefferson would speak to each other in public settings, Washington never again spoke to Jefferson or saw him privately.


5 posted on 01/11/2014 2:04:00 PM PST by rlmorel ("A nation, despicable by its weakness, forfeits even the privilege of being neutral." A. Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: rlmorel
I read that Hamilton wanted an "elective monarchy".
From the Wikipedia:

An attempt to create an elective monarchy in the United States failed. Alexander Hamilton argued in a long speech before the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that the President of the United States should be an elective monarch, ruling for "good behavior" (i.e., for life, unless impeached) and with extensive powers. Hamilton believed that elective monarchs had sufficient power domestically to resist foreign corruption, yet there was enough domestic control over their behavior to prevent tyranny at home.[3] His proposal was resoundingly voted down in favor of a four-year term with the possibility of reelection. In his later defense of the Constitution in the Federalist Papers, he often hints that a lifetime executive might be better, even as he praises the system with the four-year term.

7 posted on 01/11/2014 2:28:22 PM PST by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel

I admire Washington and hoped Jefferson’s battle of ideas would prevail, but Hamilton’s ideas of centralized federal power have prevailed today. awesome book on hamilton http://www.amazon.com/Hamiltons-Curse-Jeffersons-Revolution-Americans/dp/0307382850


17 posted on 01/11/2014 4:16:56 PM PST by patriot5186
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel
Growing up, I always thought Jefferson had the better argument, but as time went on I got less sure about that.

Jefferson was way too self-righteous -- far too convinced that he was on the right side and everything he did was justified. Hamilton seems a little more level-headed.

But then, Jefferson won -- at least in his own era. If Hamilton had lived and come back into power, he might well have become as big-headed and overbearing as Jefferson was.

28 posted on 08/09/2014 12:04:22 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson