Why on earth would you need to crash a plan with all those peope witnessing it and risking so many lives, when all you need to do to take someone into protective custody is to knock on their door when it’s dark. This is how crazy you are that you would think somebody would make up a mad crash scenario to achieve something that is done without fuss every day of the week. If you can’t explain why they went to so much trouble, your theory fails entirely. You are entering into madwoman territory.
If Fuddy quietly faded into the night there would be suspicion and no way for people like you to call the skeptics lunatics.
Just about the only argument that has been made against the evidence I have presented that suggests something screwy happened is that it would be just too crazy to believe that somebody did this. Take away that Alinsky argument based on normalcy bias that ignores everything this regime is ALREADY known to have done, and the regime has nothing.
This regime patterns itself after Josef Goebbels, who was able to get the German people to ignore killing factories that burned millions of their fellow humans by simply having the audacity to do it. The reasoning that gave them the audacity to “just do it”? People will believe a big lie before they will believe a little one. Why? Because normalcy bias is such a strong force. Nobody can believe anybody would have the audacity - or reason - to do big evil.
And in this case, the people involved did not believe it was evil, I am convinced. They did what they had to, to protect “their family”.
IMHO
Ray76, the “this is too crazy” argument is about the only argument that people have used on ALL the eligibility evidence. You know that it is not “too crazy” to say that the regime committed massive fraud. The evidence is very clear. And yet they get away with it because the normalcy bias and Alinsky tactics (and a few well-timed deaths like Breitbart...) allow people to think “it could never happen here”. So they are even bolder now than before, seeing how willing the American public is to be duped. They believe that as long as they have “plausible deniability” they’ve got it made. Doesn’t matter if extra people and equipment show up in the water on video; it can always be claimed that it is just “too crazy” to think there’s really that stuff there, and then people won’t believe their “lyin’ eyes”.
What’s sad is that they may well get away with anything they want simply because - like Goebbels - they know human nature and they have the propaganda machine and the ability to silence dissent. A really, really dangerous combination.