[Red Steel]

Most don’t know what’s going on here as usual. This is all relatively new information that has come in about last October and it is still coming - that’s only about 5 months. They have something very solid against Obama, and we will see it before the year is out.

[Seizethecarp]

“They have something very solid against Obama, and we will see it before the year is out.”

I am thinking that some whistle-blower in the DOJ got disgusted with the White House/Holder persecutorial prosecution of Sheriff Arpaio and availed themselves of the semi-autonomous status of the FBI director to investigate corruption involving the POTUS and his cabinet acting illegally on his behalf.

Arpaio has deep contacts in the FBI and DOJ and at least some of them must have been enraged by the false charges made against Arpaio designed to cause him to lose his re-election or get rail-roaded for “abusing” illegals.

The FBI is tasked to “Combat public corruption at all levels”...ALL levels, presumably including the POTUS:

http://www.fbi.gov/birmingham/about-us/priorities/priorities/#4

Criminal Priorities

4. Combat public corruption at all levels

Public corruption is a breach of the public’s trust by government officials—whether elected, appointed, or under contract—and/or private individuals who use their public office for personal gain.

It is a violation of federal law for any federal or state government official to ask for or receive anything of value for or because of any official act. Under federal law, the person who offers or pays a bribe is also guilty. These crimes are the result of deals sealed with whispered conversations, quick handshakes, and “under-the-table” money. Because of the secretive nature of bribes, such crimes are often difficult to detect and even more difficult to prove without the assistance of concerned citizens. As a result, we have set up a public corruption hotline for public tips at (877) 628-2533.

[Finalmente]

I think they do this time.

[MMaschin]

One thing I find surprising that people don't seem to be mentioning is how Zullo has described this evidence on multiple occasions. Zullo has described this "universe shattering" evidence, on multiple occasions as, "hard copy documentation".

I believe that what they have is one of three possible items, I list them IMHO from least likely to most likely. 1) an original copy of one of the newspapers showing that they did not include the birth announcements, 2) an original Sunahara birth certificate with the same number as the one on Obama's, or 3) proof that SAD was not pregnant shortly before the supposed birth date of August 4th 1961.

This new report of the MSM coming on board, and willing to report this evidence convinces me of one thing, the evidence must be strong enough that they are willing to abandon Obama in order to save their own skin. In order for the MSM to abandon Obama, this evidence must be strong enough that the MSM is worried that people will be demanding explanation of how Obama made it through the vetting process that people simply assumed the MSM (and the Democratic party) put Obama through.