Skip to comments.
Will Connecticut choose to ignore or make war against 300,000 gun registration scofflaws?
Coach is Right ^
| 3/23/14
| Doug Book
Posted on 03/23/2014 8:38:57 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-113 next last
To: JimRed
“Two wrongs do not make a right, ever. “
There is no “right” in war. If you don’t like war then don’t wage war. They drive us from our homes, we drive them from their. Got a better option?
41
posted on
03/23/2014 10:05:18 AM PDT
by
CodeToad
(Keeping whites from talking about blacks is verbal segregation!)
To: Oldpuppymax
An indication what a communists run State looks like. Police are no longer to be trusted since they are more gestapo like than servants of the public. We might call them puppets of the ruling class of communists like administrations. Connecticut is just a small sample of a State that has lost its way.
To: JimRed
“we’ll be just as evil as the oppressors. “
WWII would have been lost using your strategy.
43
posted on
03/23/2014 10:06:31 AM PDT
by
CodeToad
(Keeping whites from talking about blacks is verbal segregation!)
To: KeyLargo
They’re not as secure as they think . Have to go home to their families some time.
44
posted on
03/23/2014 10:09:30 AM PDT
by
piroque
("In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act")
To: JimRed
“Two wrongs do not make a right, ever. Harming the innocent intentionally is not an option. Regrettably, there is sometimes collateral damage, but we must avoid it when possible or we’ll be just as evil as the oppressors.”
Dude there is no cosmic universe where the American people could be as evil as the current oppressors. There is nothing evil about resisting tyranny. Its your duty.
45
posted on
03/23/2014 10:12:28 AM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: dynachrome
In view of your insightful comment, there needs to be a website setup to track these incidents and see where the data points cluster—politically, registration-wise, etc. These scum need to be exposed one incident at a time, in substantially real-time.
46
posted on
03/23/2014 10:15:22 AM PDT
by
SgtHooper
(If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you.)
To: CodeToad
47
posted on
03/23/2014 10:17:25 AM PDT
by
SgtHooper
(If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you.)
To: Cyber Liberty
Like that poacher show on TV, we need to get robotic dog statues to place in the woods to suck-in the LEO.
48
posted on
03/23/2014 10:20:58 AM PDT
by
SgtHooper
(If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you.)
To: CodeToad
Agreed. Those who think they win taking the high ground, will be the first IN the ground.
49
posted on
03/23/2014 10:24:41 AM PDT
by
SgtHooper
(If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you.)
To: arthurus
"I believe there will likely be a series of individual spectacular raids in several cities with lots of pyrotechnics and people thrown on the ground and people shot as a demonstration. Then we will see. I am sure Holder is behind-the-scenes pushing it pretty hard right now."
50
posted on
03/23/2014 10:26:11 AM PDT
by
KeyLargo
To: dynachrome
That's precisely why I said that the citizens of the state should have killed all the bureaucrats involved in taking gun information on the law's opening day — repeat until no bureaucrat would provide manpower for registration (also works for police/security protecting said bureaucrat).
The bureaucrats and police enacting or supporting such operations are what would be regarded as domestic enemies by any US military-man circa 1940 or prior.
51
posted on
03/23/2014 10:26:30 AM PDT
by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: Hogblog
.308 APIT raufoss-rounds are marvelous devices....
Just saying if you “roll you own”
52
posted on
03/23/2014 10:33:29 AM PDT
by
BigpapaBo
(If it don't kill you it'll make you _________!)
To: Oldpuppymax
I think this has been posted before - the comparison of this act and prohibition.
If not, let’s quickly review the bidding.
Both were pushed by a progressive/liberal/socialist cabal. Both were designed to cure a social ill that was destroying the nation and threating the lives of defenseless children. Both received heavy support from the media. Both were supported by legislation passed with great fanfare. Both bills were passed into law fairly quickly.
Now, how did Mr. and Mrs. J. Doe support Prohibition?
Remember that Prohibition did NOT deal with a constitutionally protected right; and the actual consumption of alcoholic beverages had been going down in the decades preceding prohibition.
Finally the minor criminals who violated Prohibition laws became celebrities and men to be admired; I will not discuss their collective impact on the society as a whole.
Now, after reviewing the bidding, as it were; does anyone wish to bet their farm that the response to this form of prohibition will be much different?
53
posted on
03/23/2014 10:34:36 AM PDT
by
Nip
(BOHEICA and TANSTAAFL - both seem very appropriate today.)
To: CodeToad
There is no right in war. If you dont like war then dont wage war. They drive us from our homes, we drive them from their. Got a better option?If I'm reading you correctly (and I hope I'm not) you would approve of killing the thugs' wives and kids. In war targeting such innocents intentionally is not acceptable, nor is it so in a civil war or second revolution.
If the kids are adult and armed, that is different.
54
posted on
03/23/2014 10:55:41 AM PDT
by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
To: KeyLargo
Being outside an armored box is not protective.
Being inside an armored box is not productive.
They have to go outside some time.
Going outside that box to harass someone with a rifle just because he has a rifle is suicidal.
55
posted on
03/23/2014 10:56:59 AM PDT
by
ctdonath2
(Making good people helpless doesn't make bad people harmless.)
To: JimRed
So your way of thinking we “USA”, were wrong in bombing Nagasaki and Hiroshima , Japan to end WW II.
56
posted on
03/23/2014 11:01:22 AM PDT
by
piroque
("In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act")
To: piroque
So your way of thinking we USA, were wrong in bombing Nagasaki and Hiroshima, Japan to end WW II. I would venture to say that they were the targeting of the city proper, not the women and children.
57
posted on
03/23/2014 11:14:00 AM PDT
by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: JimRed
Two wrongs do not make a right, ever. Harming the innocent intentionally is not an option. Regrettably, there is sometimes collateral damage, but we must avoid it when possible or we'll be just as evil as the oppressors. Right, because their families are not supporting them in anyway shape or form, huh? Get a clue.
58
posted on
03/23/2014 11:20:21 AM PDT
by
Ghost of SVR4
(So many are so hopelessly dependent on the government that they will fight to protect it.)
To: KeyLargo
Usually those are the same empty holster police that never served in the military and act like thugs that want to play soldier and dress-up to impress someone that they are tough guys. I am beginning to thing that this militarization of the po-po's is an end-run on Posse Comitatus. "That's not the military, those are police!"
59
posted on
03/23/2014 11:21:07 AM PDT
by
tpmintx
(Gun free zones are hunting preserves for unarmed people.)
To: JimRed
We leveled entire cities in WWII. Do you disapprove?
60
posted on
03/23/2014 11:21:45 AM PDT
by
CodeToad
(Keeping whites from talking about blacks is verbal segregation!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-113 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson