Every time an administration gets the idea to release Pollard, the intelligence community puts its foot down. They are so serious about it that they would be willing to destroy a presidency to prevent it.
Ruthless doesn’t even describe it.
If push comes to shove, I would not be surprised if they killed Pollard to prevent his release.
Um... I think they already did.
Every time an administration gets the idea to release Pollard, the intelligence community puts its foot down. They are so serious about it that they would be willing to destroy a presidency to prevent it.
Ruthless doesn’t even describe it.
If push comes to shove, I would not be surprised if they killed Pollard to prevent his release.
//////////////
I don’t get the hostility towards Pollard.
Pollard did wrong: He did the crime — and he has done the time. Now let him go to Israel, where he wants to be.
He was not giving intel to an enemy, as many others have done (and, at times, as I understand it, received lesser sentences).
It has been stated before that Pollard was given a very heavy sentence for what he did — heavier than the minimum sentence required.
Question are you and the “intel community” equally upset with Clinton for permitting missile tech to be given to the ChiComs. (Last I heard, he is not in prison.)
Talk about selective indignation.