Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: bootless
I do blame Obama for not immediately reversing the Bush 41 rule change.

Wasn't it actually Klintoon who deprived the military of their Second Amendment rights? Regardless of Bush 41/43's other shortcomings, they were pro-military and both served with honor. It was draft-dodger Klintoon dismantled the military and it was surely he who revoked their rights to self defense? Or am I mistaken?

14 posted on 04/03/2014 6:51:30 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP - that's what I like about Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: re_nortex

It was indeed Bush 41. Some radio hosts thought it was Clinton, but the Blaze confirmed it was during Bush 41’s term. But Clinton didn’t do anything about it, nor did 43 (and they should have). No surprise Skippy wouldn’t.


21 posted on 04/03/2014 8:15:24 PM PDT by bootless ("If we lose freedom here, there is no place to escape to. This is the last stand on Earth."~RWR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: re_nortex

PS - I do, of course, agree with you about 41 & 43’s respect for the military - and vice versa. That is evident.


23 posted on 04/03/2014 8:17:11 PM PDT by bootless ("If we lose freedom here, there is no place to escape to. This is the last stand on Earth."~RWR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson