The correct Constitutional procedure in the House is called Impeachment.
Not a bloody silly lawsuit.
Please.
The EXEMPT Prince: "Do not worry. I will delay even more,
and then ignore the Constitution, as do you, my beloved King."
Does Obama have nude photos of this jackass in the tanning bed? The Foster Brooks of American politics.
It’s a stunt
Except through direct violence, nothing in world history can be used as an example of a once-free citizenry climbing back out of darkest tyranny.
To make matters worse, compared to tyrannies of the past, no tyranny has ever been so assured of centuries of tenure thanks to the current technologies in its hands as this one.
We were warned...Very few listened...Now all the prophetic outcome-warnings since 1904 have come to pass...
Oh please!
Bonehead has the power of the purse
and he has the power of impeachment.
This lawsuit is just a stunt so he does not have to do the two mentioned
above.
OK, so we impeach Obama. We get every republican to vote for it, so it passes, and he is impeached. The Senate may not even bother holding a trial, so nothing ever comes of it.
Clinton was impeached and earned $100+ million in speaking fees, and is the most popular president on the list.
And even if Obama was convicted of impeachment, AND removed from office, Biden would be President. He wouldn’t reverse anything Obama did. Since Biden wouldn’t be signing the executive orders, we’d hardly be able to impeach him.
So we’d still have all the lawless things in place, just without the guy who did it.
The lawsuit won’t likely work, but if it managed to succeed, it would at least result in a court ruling reversing the actions of Obama on some point. No idea how that gets enforced, but a president disobeying the order of a court is a lot easier to impeach.
I’d say cut off his money. But first, the senate won’t go for it. Second, they wasted the government shutdown, won’t do it again. Third, you can’t stop them from NOT enforcing the immigration laws by cutting money for enforcing immigration laws. You might stop a few things he is actually DOING, but in most cases his lawlessness involved ignoring or changing laws to not apply parts of them, not establishing a large new amount of spending.