Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

At Walgreen, renouncing corporate citizenship
Yahoo! Finance / The New York Times ^ | July 1, 2014 | Andrew Ross Sorkin

Posted on 07/01/2014 3:19:54 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

A little less than two years ago, Gregory D. Wasson, the chief executive of Walgreen, sought a series of tax breaks from Illinois, where his company is based.

“We are proud of our Illinois heritage,” he said at the time. “Just as our stores and pharmacies are health and daily living anchors for the communities we serve, we as a company are now recommitted to serving as an economic anchor for northeastern Illinois.”

The state gave Walgreen $46 million in corporate income tax credits over 10 years in exchange for a pledge to create 500 jobs and invest in upgrading its offices. The state also provided $625,000 in training money and $875,000 in other tax incentives.

Mr. Wasson’s actions, however, could soon run counter to his words. The same chief executive who said he was so “proud of our Illinois heritage” is now considering moving the company’s headquarters to Switzerland as part of a merger with Alliance Boots, a European drugstore chain.

Why? To lower Walgreen’s tax bill even further.

Alarmingly, dozens of large United States companies are contemplating the increasingly popular tax-skirting tactic known as an inversion. Under the strategy, companies merge with foreign rivals in countries with lower tax rates and then reincorporate there while still enjoying the benefits of doing a large part of their business in the United States....

(Excerpt) Read more at finance.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Society
KEYWORDS: americaindecline; corporatetaxes; corporations; globalism; goodbyeamerica; illinois; inversion; switzerland; taxdodge; taxes; walgreens
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 07/01/2014 3:19:54 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Alarmingly, dozens of large United States companies are contemplating the increasingly popular tax-skirting tactic known as an inversion.

What?!??! You mean corporations aren't slaves to the US Welfare State???? You mean we can't force them to be an ATM for all kinds of handouts until we bleed them dry??? You mean a CEO would not willingly let his company die a slow death by a thousand taxes to support America's decline into Socialistic Hell???

2 posted on 07/01/2014 3:23:24 PM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Shocking! [eyeroll]

You don’t want people to notice and act accordingly, don’t tax them to death. Asshats.


3 posted on 07/01/2014 3:24:34 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

You have to remember it’s the New York Times.


4 posted on 07/01/2014 3:24:41 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Math ain’t hard.


5 posted on 07/01/2014 3:26:44 PM PDT by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

As a CEO answering to his shareholders, he is obligated to pay as low a tax rate as he can legally. You want to attract businesses make it cheaper for then to operate in your state, country. Understand though that they will only stay if the benefits continue.


6 posted on 07/01/2014 3:27:22 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Exactly. Companies don’t relocate to save a percent or two on taxes, because the upheaval is something they would rather avoid. It takes a really onerous tax burden to start causing companies to flee on a large scale.

Now, private businesses are a lot smarter about this than the government. They know consumers will switch to competing brands if they raise the prices too steeply, so they are careful to make every price increase small enough that consumers do not notice. Governments are used to acting as if they have no competition, so they have never learned this lesson.


7 posted on 07/01/2014 3:28:53 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek
Math ain’t hard.

It is if you're a liberal. Damn near impossible in fact. If you're a liberal, the rich have an infinite number of dollars, but are too stupid to notice if you loot them. Also, you can raise people's standard of living by arbitrarily changing the digits on their paycheck. These are the kind of people who try to cool off their kitchen by leaving the fridge door open.

8 posted on 07/01/2014 3:31:06 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

In Massachusetts the income tax rate was dropped a half a percent 10 years ago but you can check a box to pay the higher rate. Less than a thousand do every year.


9 posted on 07/01/2014 3:33:55 PM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
In Walgreen’s case, an inversion would be an affront to United States taxpayers.

It doesn't bother me. More power to them. Less taxes for the regime to redistribute to welfare queens. Starve the beast.

10 posted on 07/01/2014 3:34:56 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

At the risk of being slightly off topic, the McCormick spice company is considering moving its corporate headquarters (about 800 employees) out of tax crazy Maryland. Adding to the ecomomic impact is the fact that Maryland culture is associated with the McCormick product Old Bay seasoning which is used to flavor crabs.

McCormick is looking at neighboring states that are more financially attractive. The governor of Maryland, Martin O’Malley, has made the state a tax hell.


11 posted on 07/01/2014 3:35:26 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AU72

So much for liberals wanting to pay their “fair share”.


12 posted on 07/01/2014 3:35:54 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MUDDOG

Yeah, more like an affront to the greedy governments in the US, whether federal or state, who find it insulting they should have to compete like their superiors do every day.


13 posted on 07/01/2014 3:36:09 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Just think how much more tyrannical the gov’t would be if these corporations couldn’t vote with their feet.


14 posted on 07/01/2014 3:44:23 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Maybe the ‘bring jobs back now’ broken record will understand the problem after reading this. Probably not.


15 posted on 07/01/2014 3:48:38 PM PDT by deadrock (I am someone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The .govs still haven’t figured out that the more you tax something, less of that something will occur.


16 posted on 07/01/2014 3:49:09 PM PDT by bkopto (Free men are not equal. Equal men are not free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Doesn’t the USA have the highest corporate taxes in the world? May have somethign to do with that?
Leftists have succeeded in creating the hate business state.


17 posted on 07/01/2014 3:54:51 PM PDT by vpintheak (I will not comply!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Liberalism is economically unsustainable.


18 posted on 07/01/2014 3:54:58 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

bump


19 posted on 07/01/2014 4:01:49 PM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

ummm...have you engaged a youth lately?

Holy cow.


20 posted on 07/01/2014 4:05:09 PM PDT by logi_cal869
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson