Oh look, demanding an experiment for something you know full well is outside of experimental scope. I’ll return the demand, demonstrate the Biblical hypothesis, go ahead, show me how you make a universe in 7 days.
Meanwhile, out here in the land of science we’ve got a pretty good path on how matter coalesced, made planets and stars, life came from somewhere, that one’s still a little rough but we’re a young brain on a young planet deciphering an old and large universe, things evolved, here we are. If you were actually interested in the subject, which we both know you are not, there’s a whole lotta books you can read.
If it is outside the realm of observation, then by definition it is within the realm of philosophy and conjecture, not the realm of science.
It doesn’t matter how many idiots try to confuse the two.
Thank you for confirming that you can not tell the difference between the two.
Since you have already proven on this thread that you are personally dishonest and have no intention of abiding by agreements you make, that makes you zero for.two.
Ok I will name the very first thing to exist, in my theory, and how it came into existence ....then you name the very first thing to exist, in your theory (actually it is only a hypothesis) and how it came into existence.
God the eternal Creator.
Actually I just answered both questions in four words.
Your turn!
You can’t because something cannot come from nothing, therefore there has to be an eternal something and it has to have intelligence and the ability to create something from nothing...which would be the second something.