Posted on 07/15/2014 3:03:06 PM PDT by Hostage
Ann Coulter is so upset she vowed to start fasting. I have no idea how we’ll know if she follows through.
McDaniel ping
HAHAHAHA!!! Right! :-) As it is, she has to run around in the shower just to get wet.
Ah don’t be like that. LL was right enough and, more importantly IMO, polite.
Sure, nothing’s truely “inevitable” but death and taxes...
Oh, God! Now I’ve got in my mind a picture of the skinny b.tch running around naked in a shower! Oooh!
Oh, my bad. ;-)
Ha! Will always love Diana Ross!
Sun Herald: http://www.sunherald.com/2014/07/15/5699806/supreme-court-orders-responses.html
No update yet from Clarion-Ledger.
The leftwing rags there are spinning it as “McDaniel Ordered By Supremes to Provide More Information” without mentioning much about ordering Harris County and the MS AG to respond.
death to ALL tyrants. wherever they may reside.
The curtains don’t match the carpet though.
Why oh Why do you Freepers have to make fun of skinny people?
I would dance around in the shower with ANN and afterwards she could bring crackers into my bed if she felt like a BIG meal.
Breitbart:
Both sides seem to concur that the documents were discarded, but disagree on the method and reason for discarding them. Someone definitely needs to put Mary Bankston under oath.
I put "credientials" in quotation marks to show that I was quoting the exact spelling used by the poster who challenged my legal "credientials." His mistake, not mine.
Not in Mississippi, where an ordinary appeal to the Supreme Court is taken by a Notice of Appeal, not by a Petition. Miss. Rules App. Proc. 3(a), 16(a).
It doesn’t matter what the subject of the petition is, a supreme court always has discretion to not hear a case.
Once again, not in Mississippi, where an extraordinary Petition for Mandamus, which this, can be granted or can be denied on the merits, but must be decided one way or the other. Miss. Rules App. Proc. 21.
You’ve probably already figured this out, Hostage, but I’ll say this anyway. LL is indeed a lawyer. I know him, meaning his name and what he does for a living. He very graciously answers SCOTUS-related questions for my SCOTUS ping list. I having a standing request with him to correct or clarify any misstatements I make about legal issues or decisions. He’s a very decent guy.
FRegards
I think McDaniel will be granted the writ. I was merely pointing out the the target of the writ has no right to answer unless requested by the court.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.