[hinckley buzzard]

It is not possible to misunderstand this article, if you have so much as a rudimentary grasp of English. My Gosh. Of course, you do have to actually read it don't you.

Anyone who reads this and thinks it is a slam at Israel is beyond redemption anyhow.

[hinckley buzzard]

Of course now, minutes later, after having read the comments above, I realize the depth to which FR readership has sunk. Pathetic.

[Resettozero]

It is not possible to misunderstand this article, if you have so much as a rudimentary grasp of English. My Gosh. Of course, you do have to actually read it don't you. Anyone who reads this and thinks it is a slam at Israel is beyond redemption anyhow.

I posted only after reading the entire article. What's the problem with what I posted?

[mountainlion]

It is not possible to misunderstand this article, if you have so much as a rudimentary grasp of English. My Gosh. Of course, you do have to actually read it don't you.

Some archaic styles are not familiar to the general public. The first paragraph is in regular english. The style changes to some sort of garble after that. If the article is as bad as the excerpt it is not worth my time trying to decipher the words to try to get to the authors meaning. It is kinda like trying to understand a drunk.