To: TADSLOS
"The Army has never been known for being highly flexible in its institutional thinking with regards to rank/grade, leadership roles, schooling etc..." Agreed. Our Army has historically succeeded in spite of itself, and some of its biggest obstacles have been of its own making. It really is a tribute to the American attitude and spirit and our unique approach to warfighting. I don't think any other army in the world could function in the manner ours has based simply on culture. We have normaly taken a few bloody noses like Kasserine Pass or TF Smith, and bounced back smartly.
The problem I foresee is that the American culture is changing much more rapidly than the Army will be able to adapt, and it's going to have a horrible impact on our ability fight. I hope I'm wrong.
15 posted on
09/13/2014 8:26:52 AM PDT by
Joe 6-pack
(Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
To: Joe 6-pack
The problem I foresee is that the American culture is changing much more rapidly than the Army will be able to adapt, and it's going to have a horrible impact on our ability fight. I hope I'm wrong. Not only that, but the deeply embedded social engineers won't allow for any adaptations that doesn't fit their leftist agenda.
17 posted on
09/13/2014 8:42:44 AM PDT by
TADSLOS
(The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
To: Joe 6-pack
Desmond Doss was a damned fine Army Medic. But would he have made a good NCO? Hardly. He was a conscientious objector, or c-o as they were known in my day.
The Specialist Grades did confuse many as to exactly what authority they had. What specific rank did it correspond with, etc.
22 posted on
09/13/2014 12:11:46 PM PDT by
donozark
(The voices inside my head may not be real, but they have some good ideas!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson