Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Fantasywriter

Hawaii law allows for inspection of the original document under a court order. If a member of Congress or a congressional committee wanted to see the original, they can obtain a court order for its release.

If someone alleges forgery, the probative evidence of that crime is submitted to a prosecuting attorney because forgery is a felony. No one has ever been able to interest a prosecutor in convening a grand jury investigation of forgery.


94 posted on 09/20/2014 11:08:39 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus (PALIN/CRUZ: 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: Nero Germanicus

Here’s what’s interesting. No one in HI remembers a pregnant Stanley Ann. No one has the foggiest idea where she lived. No one recalls her going to the hospital, coming home, or leaving for Seattle. People do recall Stanley Ann in HI prior to the ~10 mo black out period, but no one remembers her during that time.

Your response is to quote a document accepted as legitimate by 100 percent of Obots and fundamentally questioned by many conservatives. [Conveniently, the only person who ‘remembers’ SADO is dead. Nice how that works out for you & Obama.] You also cite a legal system revered by far left liberals and despised by conservatives.

What is it with you Obama defenders lately? You all are going out of your way to self identify as far left liberals.


96 posted on 09/21/2014 10:37:01 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

To: Nero Germanicus

It pains me to say this, but as liberal anti-birthers go, you are not one of the honest ones. This post illustrates that.

Let me explain. Some time ago, Virginia Sunahara’s brother tried to obtain a copy of her birth certificate. According to the law, he had every right to do so. Prior to HI’s decision on the matter, I visited an anti-birther site. [Back then I occasionally did that. These days, never.]

Anyway, one of the posters, a total Obot anti-birther, said this case would either validate or invalidate birther claims that HI is corrupt and predisposed to protect Obama and thwart birthers. The poster said if the state allowed the brother to obtain a copy of his sister’s BC, birthers would have egg on their faces. If he were denied, it would prove our claims in a troubling and indisputable way.

That was maybe the only honest anti-birther in the world. The rest of you just shill for Obama. You don’t do so objectively or intelligently, but just by rote. You have your talking points which you repeat forever. You never admit what that lone anti-birther admitted—the deck is stacked for Obama and against birthers. You just prattle along like a good shill, repeating your mindless drivel. What a sordid way to spend your time.


98 posted on 09/21/2014 10:57:41 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson