No. Only the one about the affair with Glenn Rice. That one I believe because its very plausible. Not the other crap.
That Glen Rice nonsense? Initiated by the same psycho anti-Palin blogger crowd. Joe McGinniss latched onto it, and calculatedly asked only THREE questions of Rice, beginning with “what do you think of Palin” and ending with “did she ever express to you any qualms about sleeping with black guys?” A line of three deliberately leading questions to ‘imply’ that something sexual happened between them. McGinniss never even directly asked if they had sex! Because he was specifically laying to groundwork to ‘imply’ something happened, by that calculated line of three limited questions.
If anything happened between the two, he would have asked 50 questions, 100 questions. Lots of detailed questions. And devoted a chapter in his book to it. But no, he asked THREE leading questions, designed to make it sound like something happened, and then postulated/fantasized on the scenario. That was what he put in his book. Then, when McGinniss went on tv to sell his lie-filled book, he claimed it as a fact. One of the most outlandish examples of journalistic scumbaggery imagineable.
Figures you’d buy into that. It had about as much credibility as Kitty Kelly’s book claiming Nancy Reagan was bedding Frank Sinatra in the White House when he visited.