“Natural Rights?” What does sexual orientation have to do with rights? Sorry. Couldn’t wade through the article.
Sorry, but you won’t do very well attempting to defend the radical homosexual movement here today. Since you were unable to “wade through” that short column, I don’t guess you understand about God-given, unalienable natural rights. That’s really too bad.
I kinda skimmed through it too. I choose to think of natural rights as my right of free association. I choose not to associate with homer sexurals. AFAIC my right is preeminent.
I don’t think it means a wit about what queers do. They can call anything they want, anything they want. It doesn’t make it so...
We just need to be vigilant with our kids and grand kids to make sure they get it right. But isn’t that what we’ve always done?
Homosexuality from Several Viewpoints from our Faith Facts site: http://www.faithfacts.org/christ-and-the-culture/gay-rights
Attempting to make clear in what can best be described as State Department sophistry Hillary Clinton compared the struggle for gay rights to women’s rights and racial equality, and said a country’s cultural or religious traditions are no excuse for discrimination, “gay rights are human rights, and human rights are gay rights”.
The fallacy in this statement should be self-evident, gay rights and human rights simply can’t be conflated. We all have human rights simply by virtue of us being human, without distinction to one’s race, color, creed or sexual proclivities. One is founded in the tenets of moral objectivism and the other moral subjectivism, it’s antithesis. The mere juxtaposition of the two words exposes not only the antithetical nature that exists but the clear understanding that one cannot be promoted without the expense of the other, logic would therefore dictate that gay rights can only be promoted at the expense of human rights. - See more at: http://laotze.blogspot.com/2014/02/americas-homosexual-jingoism-part-1.html#sthash.iNW5Nj9c.dpuf
“Natural Rights?” What does sexual orientation have to do with rights? Sorry. Couldn’t wade through the article.
There is no such thing as sexual orientation until some one deviates from normal.
Also your right to call perversion by it’s name is under attack.
The important point has nothing to do with sodomites. It has to do with the legal ability to redefine words.