I disagree. I think the ebola in Liberia is fairly well known. It’s not made up. It’s real.
So, quarantine is a reasonable measure. And a tent is not just a reasonable accommodation, but it’s also a logical place for a disease that requires eradication. Tents are easily destroyed.
I'm playing devil's advocate here a bit; I agree 100% that a tent is reasonable and maybe necessary. I am simply stating that our six-figure McMansion crowd, who ultimately play a key role as citizens in defining public policy through their voice and vote, will not stand for this as a reasonable accommodation. Ultimately, government power is limited to what people would tolerate, so where is the line? Again, I think the courts are where this needs to be ironed out, better now than in the midst of a crisis.