Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan
"But we are rapidly moving towards a society in which there will be a lot of stuff around, but very few people required to produce it. A economy of abundance. This is, of course, the end result of constantly increasing productivity."

The global warmists, Obama and the rest of the Marxists are moving aggressively to make sure that doesn't happen in the US. Carbon controls and radically higher energy costs will destroy the middle class and force dependency on big government if they have their way.

18 posted on 11/14/2014 3:10:44 AM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Truth29

Big government enthusiasts should encourage the (IMO unstoppable anyway) move towards an economy of abundance.

In such a society, most people will be simply surplus to the economic system. I’ve tried to think of a way to distribute the goods produced by some mechanism other than an all-powerful government, but without a great deal of success.

The end result of such a system will probably be, ironically, to concentrate power in those few people still essential to running the system and in that somewhat larger number who will control the distribution of what it produces. That power may or may not necessarily correlate with the distribution of wealth.

I’d be thrilled if somebody has workable ideas whereby an economy of abundance distributes societal power as widely as it does “stuff,” but I’ve yet to see such ideas.


19 posted on 11/14/2014 3:16:37 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson