Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ilovesarah2012

You could use this argument against any large infrastructure project.


3 posted on 11/19/2014 5:52:50 AM PST by Former Proud Canadian (Gold and Silver, Accept No Substitutes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Former Proud Canadian

And I’m sure they would.


15 posted on 11/19/2014 6:02:08 AM PST by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Former Proud Canadian
You could use this argument against any large infrastructure project.

Got it! For example, the megamosque in Tennessee should never be constructed because.. rape.

16 posted on 11/19/2014 6:02:27 AM PST by ScottinVA (We either destroy ISIS there... or fight them here. Pick one, America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Former Proud Canadian
You could use this argument against any large infrastructure project.

Which means that Obama's stimulus program was probably the greatest impetus to rape since Mohammend invented Muslims. Obama, as the smartest man ever to become president, must have known this. Talk about a war on women!

28 posted on 11/19/2014 6:10:33 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Former Proud Canadian
You could use this argument against any large infrastructure project.

Exactly. Next time you hear a liberal spout this nonsense answer them with the following:

Ok, Mr Progressive, so the construction crews on the XL pipeline will commit violence against women. Then, riddle me this: When 0bama passed the so-called $791 billion "stimulus bill", that was for "rebuilding our infrastructure". Why didn't you protest those "construction projects"??? Was it because

A) Those construction crews would be all female, thus not prone to violence against women>>>

B) Indian lands would be left out of those construction projects, thus no jobs would "be created" on tribal lands

OR

C) Everybody knew the stimulus package was a $791 billion boondoggle designed to redistribute the taxpayers money to local government union pension funds and would not create any jobs at all.

53 posted on 11/19/2014 7:54:58 AM PST by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson