Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: walford; re_nortex

... the Prosecutor did not have to convene a Grand Jury at all. But he did and his statement was illuminating and should have satisfied anyone actually interested in evidence and true justice. For that I commend him.
**************************
Fully agree! The Prosecuter whould have been villified as a racist if he had just refused to bring charges. His father was a police officer who was killed by a black.

He sent the case to a Grand Jury and did not present anything to the GJ himself, while two assistants did and put forth FIVE possible charges that would be decided.

That was the best and most fair decision to eliminate claims of bias against the Prosecutor and permit a GJ of local citizens of various demographics to make the final decision.


9 posted on 11/25/2014 12:40:34 AM PST by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: octex

“That was the best and most fair decision to eliminate claims of bias against the Prosecutor and permit a GJ of local citizens of various demographics to make the final decision.”


And yet there is still rioting and looting going on. The lynch mob never cared about evidence, only race. If the perp is black and the victim is not, the latter is the one who is supposed to die.

I am a staunch 2nd Amendment supporter, but personally do not like guns. I don’t like the noise, the odor the recoil or the expense — but am getting one ASAP.


10 posted on 11/25/2014 6:09:34 AM PST by walford (https://www.facebook.com/wralford [feel free to friend me] @wralford on Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson