How, I wonder, were the comments of the learned (cough) professor related to the content of his lecture?
Was there a direct correspondence, or was the eminent (wheeze) Dr. simply free-lancing?
I teach psychology as an adjunct at a local community college, and nothing in my textbooks or lecture materials lends itself to the sort of diatribe detailed in the news reports.
Indeed, while our administration permits a certain latitude in matters political, faculty are cautioned against using their position to proselytize in any regard.
What this idiot doesn't realize is that his comments tell us a lot more people his own personal "psychology" than about the Tea Party.