[Opinionated Blowhard]

For those who don’t like Huckabee because he pardoned too many prisoners, or advocated for too many social programs, . . . . you call him a nanny-stater, and come up with all kinds of reasons to disqualify him, but what you’re really saying is that Huckabee is a Christian, all the way through, and that offends you. If it does, come out and say it.

I'm offended that someone thinks pardoning Maurice Clemmons and advocating budget-busting spending increases and entitlement expansions is what a true Christian would do.

[Turbo Pig]

but what you’re really saying is that Huckabee is a Christian, all the way through, and that offends you. If it does, come out and say it.

I'll take what you said on the matter and add this:

That sounds an awful lot like "It's because he's black" to me.

[Col Freeper]

For those who don’t like Huckabee because he pardoned too many prisoners, or advocated for too many social programs, . . . . you call him a nanny-stater, and come up with all kinds of reasons to disqualify him, but what you’re really saying is that Huckabee is a Christian, all the way through, and that offends you. If it does, come out and say it.

=======================================================================

I'm offended that someone thinks pardoning Maurice Clemmons and advocating budget-busting spending increases and entitlement expansions is what a true Christian would do.

Yes.

What the author is attempting to do is create an "anti-Christian" card that is equivalent to the overused, burntout "Race" card used by Obama and the "Poverty Pimp" crowd.

To disagree with Huckabee is to be anti-Christian, just like to disagree with Obama is Racist, according to this article's Author.

It's wrong on so many levels, and dishonest in it's inference.