Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/15/2015 4:59:06 AM PST by LeoMcNeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: LeoMcNeil

2 posted on 01/15/2015 5:04:45 AM PST by lormand (Inside every liberal is a dung slinging monkey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LeoMcNeil
Excellent article. Until very recently, I was a fan of Ron Paul. Not on everything, but on many things. Then he came out with those despicable Charlie Hebdo comments.

I'm done with Ron Paul, really don't care what he has to say going forward. And yep, that will somewhat affect my view of the son.

3 posted on 01/15/2015 5:08:11 AM PST by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LeoMcNeil

Rand Paul’s pandering has proven him to be more liberal than libertarian.


4 posted on 01/15/2015 5:12:20 AM PST by cripplecreek ("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LeoMcNeil

Listen, if Rand Paul’s dad is a potential problem for him, then you can be certain beyond all doubt that Ted Cruz’s dad will be hung on him by the libs like the corpse of Mussolini on a lamp post.

The fact is that like it or not the sins of the fathers are visited on the sons - at least in the minds of many. Sad to say.

I hope that for those of us fortunate enough to have good conservative values will judge the man and not the libtards’ caricature.


8 posted on 01/15/2015 5:21:42 AM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LeoMcNeil
He inspires the conservative and libertarian wings of the Republican Party.

Author started going off the rails in the 2nd sentence.

He doesn't inspire any conservative that has been paying attention to his behavior.
10 posted on 01/15/2015 5:25:00 AM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LeoMcNeil

He has no chance because he exists outside of the Crowned Heads of the Republican Party.


13 posted on 01/15/2015 5:29:22 AM PST by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LeoMcNeil

Do only psychopaths, thieves and narcissists go into politics?


15 posted on 01/15/2015 5:35:36 AM PST by Salvey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LeoMcNeil

Candidate of last resort, so far but that may change if he says anymore stupid stuff. If not Ted, or Scott, then maybe Rand but probably not, he hasn’t been very good lately.


18 posted on 01/15/2015 5:40:40 AM PST by VTenigma (The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LeoMcNeil

No shot on target because he is a loose canon ?


19 posted on 01/15/2015 5:43:45 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LeoMcNeil

Continuing the family tradition of their daddies: the Pauls and the Romneys are professional runners-for-president.

Rand’s biggest problem to date is that he has become squishy on issues and seems to be contradicting earlier stands. There seems to be no group that he will not pander to. He seems to be trying to be all things to all people, and that makes him appear to have little substance.


24 posted on 01/15/2015 6:07:17 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LeoMcNeil
Quote:
"He inspires the conservative and libertarian wings of the Republican Party."

I stopped reading right there. Where has this author been the last few years? ...or for that matter, the last six months? When was this pathetic narrative conceived?

There may have been a brief moment in time, back in 2008, even 2009 -2010 when Rand clearly distanced himself from his nutty dad's political positions. Since then, Rand has gone bonkers - going so far as to aid and abet Sharpton's vision.

Rand Paul doesn't have a chance in gaining Conservative's support for a 2016 run for POTUS.

25 posted on 01/15/2015 6:48:49 AM PST by wtd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LeoMcNeil

I don’t think Rand Paul will actually even run. Why give up a senate seat for an iffy chance at the Presidency? He’s a good voice for personal freedom in the Senate. At Rand Paul’s age he would be better positioned in 2020 anyway.


30 posted on 01/15/2015 9:11:15 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LeoMcNeil
As of today I could vote for

Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, Dr. Ben Carson and Bobby Jindal

NO WAY IN H*LL...... will I ever vote for the following Internationalist (aka Republicans In Name Only).

Mitt Romney
Jeb Bush
Chris Christy
Marco Rubio

Maybe... Don't know enough about the following candidates

Mike Huckabee
Scott Walker
Rick Santorum
John Kasich

55 posted on 01/16/2015 8:38:11 PM PST by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson