Yes, really. Take away the A&D bio (the one intended for circulation to just a smattering of publishers and that was in all probability largely ignored until someone at Breitbart wrested it from obscurity) and the "born in Kenya" narrative is at the near complete evaporation point.
Whereas, by contrast, the "born in Hawaii" narrative has a host of both documentary and testamentary evidence, most of which doesn't come from Obama. And, of course, chief among these are the certificates and verifications from the state of Hawaii. For after all, state certification is what we all use to demonstrate birth facts, right? And state records are the thing that come with Constitutional significance under the Full, Faith & Credit clause, right?
But,I know,these are things you cannot acknowledge or discuss because they make your position very hard to sustain.
Oops; you missed the most important part the post:
“How about for starters the fact that Obama is a pathological liar. When it comes to so notorious and disordered a liar, what makes more sense: to question his various stories, or to buy them hook, line and sinker?
Or do you not admit that Obama lies pretty much every time his lips are moving?”