No. NO. NO! I've told you before (and have made similar statements to others on this forum since 2013) that I am not defending "a man." I am defending either of two things pertaining to what are generally termed "Birther" or "eligibilty" issues: a) that as to his birth, there is (i) both documentary and testamentary evidence spanning a period of 50 years that all mutually corroborates BHO,II's claim of Hawaiian birth and (ii) no credible, if any, evidence of him being born in any other place, thus by any reasonable standard of evidence and proof, consistently applied, the case for Hawaiian birth stands proven; and (b) there is no "two citizen parent" requirement for Article II "natural born citizen." Precious little in proof of (a) turns on Obama's credibility. And absolutely nothing in (b) does. Yet at every turn you ignore the main points I make and keep trying to drag things into a discussion on Obama's veracity. Yours is one continuous strawman argument.
‘Yet at every turn you ignore the main points I make’
That’s not true. A couple of times I have tried to discuss your main points. But discussion of them is like sunlight to a vampire to you. Discussion is not what you want/can handle. You require absolute obeisance. The only thing you can handle in response to your main points is servile acceptance.
If somebody actually challenges your points, you go bananas. As in, you go berserk/off the deep end/off the rails on a crazy train. You literally can’t handle it. It’s painful to watch. I would gladly discuss your points with a rational conservative. There is a good case to counter them. But this case cannot be made to you. You, being a tightly-wound far left liberal, go haywire/nuts/lunatic/wild at the hint of any push back against your points.
You are too emotionally invested in them. They are all you have. Any challenge to them short circuits your brain, and an irrational fit ensues. You may enjoy it. You must, or you’d at least make an effort to stay sane. But trust me, it’s no fun on the other end. A liberal having a mental meltdown is not someone the average person wants to engage with. It’s unpleasant. Perhaps that’s the point? You figure if you freak out sufficiently, no one will dare to argue with you? That was Hillary’s approach. Just start shrieking and screaming and emotionally melting down, and people back off. It worked for her, and you figure why shouldn’t it work for you. Make your freak outs crazy enough, and people will just want to leave it/you alone.
But then you whine and cry and moan unceasingly. ‘Waaah...nobody will discuss my main points...waaaah.’ Well maybe if you could drop the insanity and discuss them rationally....
But you can’t. So stop whining about it. It’s your fault; suck it up and live with it.