You are just a person intent on spreading deliberate lies, and there is no real benefit to be had from presenting you with evidence. You are a liar, (Or a person so deluded as to be unable to distinguish the difference) and you have no interest in the truth.
This is what I thought you were from beginning, and this is exactly what you have turned out to be.
Just as I predicted. If I give a short answer, you claim I'm "brushing aside" your points and do the silly snowplow picture, acting as if your points can't be answered. If, instead, I go point-by-point through your stuff and reply substantively and document my reply with source materials, it's a 'wall of text' and you can pretend you haven't just had your a** handed to you on a plate.
THe Letterman Show needs a "Stupid Debating Tricks" segment. You could be star.
Document one factual point I've been in error on and you win a prize. I challenged you to this upstream the last time you called me a liar. I predicted you'd fail and it would be crickets from you. It was. I predict the same again.
Whereas I've now caught you deliberately truncating Congressman Wilson's comments in the attempt to make it appear he favored your view. That was blatant deceit.
Trying to turn the tables by calling me a liar is laughable. You can play to the peanut gallery. But you and I know better. Fool.